Before the break, we needed a hands-on activity for physics class. We decided to go with the make-your-own-mobile project since we had been studying torques in class (thank you, Ms. Kreutter, for that project!). Students were to bring in their own thematic items to hang in several off-set tiers. A typical one might look like this:
(shout out to EC and KS for having the first completed mobile!)
Now, in the middle of this activity, I go to the weekly leadership team meeting (yes, they still let me attend for some reason). As soon as I walk in, the new librarian waves me over and surreptitiously hands me a sheet of paper.
"I found this on the printer in the media center the other day. I was wondering if I should be concerned so I called over another teacher and she just said 'Oh, that's just Rideout - no problem. If it was a different teacher, you might need to follow up.' "
I look at the print out, laughed a bit nervously and start to explain "Yes, well, ahem, you see - there's this mobile project and, umm, they are hanging things and one group thought it'd be funny to put my face on the items..."
At this point, the principal walks by. She glances down at the sheet in my hands and has heard the last few words coming out of my mouth. She smiles and looks at both of us, "More members of the fan club, Rideout?" and walks on by.
Slightly ashamed, I grab my seat next to the history department chair. He sees the print out now, too, and, without missing a beat says, "Oh, I see you got my print-out for me, Ken, thanks!".
Here's the final product: (You have to look hard to see the pics but they are on there)
Pretty sure OL and SX are more in the Rideout-Mocking club than the Fan Club...
------------
Astute readers will notice there is a ringer amongst the photos. When I pointed this out to the Mobile Makers, they said "That's the version of you you wish you were."
That bass lets you know there's something menacing afoot, right?
Then you starting tuning in on some clues:
"Who was it you called the good shepherd," Hmmm... seems like a Jesus/Christian reference
"Who measured the distance from the planets Right down to your big blue spinning world" Compare to Isaiah 40:12: Who has measured the watersin the hollow of his hand, or with the breadth of his hand marked off the heavens?
So, Nick is putting into juxtaposition the role of parenting and that of god and mankind.
But, what about that refrain and title? Could it be a reference to the 1959 classic Gwendolyn Brooks poem: We Real Cool
Live fast but die young? The folly of youth is to think they are cool. Hmmm...
Go back to those opening lines: "Who took your measurements? From your toes to the top of your head"
I was thinking your parents or a doctor when you are born or maybe god may be measuring mankind, but the undertaker does that as well when he puts you in your coffin now doesn't he?
So, quick recap: We have themes of parenting, god, birth, and death.
Now what about this pivot to Wikipedia and facts about the stars?
Have we lost religion and replaced it with science? Or is it that science and religion are where we turn to for answers? Or is it simply that when we look at those stars, we are looking into the past? Is a single human life a metaphor for the life of our species in the cosmos? Are we all always stuck to be simply looking to the past? Do we, as a species, think we are so cool simply because we are so young in the cosmic scheme and don't know anything?
"The past is the past and it's here to stay" Yes, we can always visit our departed loved ones in our memories just like we see the light from those long dead stars...
"And I hope you hear me, and you'll call"
Do the dead hear us? Can we get a call from the past? Do we as a species know anything? Are we, as a species, living fast and dying young? If god is out there, is she going to reach out?
Damn, Nick, did you just sing me a song about life, death, god, science, and the fundamental human condition of not knowing anything for sure except that we yearn for connection and meaning?
I looked up the album notes in Wikipedia and Nick said "if I were to use that threadbare metaphor of albums being like children, then Push The Sky Away is the ghost-baby in the incubator". So the song is meta as well: a song about songs (just like the 1959 poem has a jazz reference embedded in it!)... Every song is like a child to an artist, isn't it?
Awestruck am I. Even if I'm just projecting my own stuff into your magnificent song, thanks for creating the space for me, Nick.
Show most people in my generation the pics below and they will tell you what album this is from a distance with ease (well, the cool kids from my generation anyway!).
At the risk of sounding like an old nostalgic, obsolete guy who just doesn't 'get it', let me tell you about a huge difference in experiencing music that my kids have with what I experienced when I was their age:
They get a music recommendation from a friend; they open another tab on their device and bring up a song or video or whatever; they listen while multitasking; they like it; they branch out and find other similar songs. Cool. Very cool - it's all there, just a click away. Easily accessible and always available.
When I was maybe 13 or 14, one of my friends (sorry guys, I can't remember which one of you!) introduced me to Pink Floyd. The next time I was at The Mall, I bought the album below:
The paper insert was inside the shrink wrap because the album was only identified in tiny letters on the spine
I went into my room, closed the door, peeled off the shrink wrap and the record was revealed as a double album. With art. With artistically crafted lyric sheets. I felt like I had just won the lottery. I put the first album on and played the entire double album through in one sitting, alone, in my semi-dark bedroom reading the lyric sheets over and over. It was intense. It was cathartic. It was enlightening. It was like going to concert with no crowds to bother me. It was like watching a movie, reading a book, and listening to great songs all at once.
I'm not saying instant, easy access has ruined The Experience. But I am saying it was different.
P.S. Yes, I still have most of my teenage records but no longer have a record player. My kids will have to deal with those records after I'm dead because even if I never use them again there is no way in hell I'm parting with them! (for the record (see what I did there?), my collection includes two Bob Dylan albums (Blonde on Blonde and Highway 61 Revisited) from my father who carefully pulled them out of the bottom of a drawer when I was sixteen and handed them to me in a way that let me know they were sacred. Don't worry, Dad - they're still safe!
Generally, I don't put too much stock into dreams or dream interpretations. Not that I don't find it interesting, I just think some put a bit too much faith into those neural firings getting stirred up by your brain deciding which short term memories to jettison from your day and which ones to lay down as permanent memories.
A lot of my dreams are so quotidian that, if I remember them, I think they are simply memories of an actual day's event. One time (years ago) I dreamed I was exploring the edge of the school property and there was a gate with a lock on it in front of a path that was a short-cut to my house. After several weeks of avoiding that particular path, I went to check out the path to see if someone had removed the lock. Turns out there never was a gate, much less a lock. "Idiot!"*
Over the years, I've had a few lucid dreams but the only really long and intense ones were in my teenage years (which I think is a common experience). If I start to have one these days I pretty much wake myself up right away and spoil it.
This vacation week I've been doing a lot of reading and a lot of movie watching. So, unremarkably, I've had dreams in which I am reading and dreams in which I am watching movies. Remarkably, I've had two lucid dreams this week involving these mundane activities.
Lucid Dream #1: a few nights ago I was dreaming that I was reading a book. I became somewhat self-aware and thought "Hmmm... I wonder if my brain would fill in actual text if I concentrate on the book". So I did and I started to read a book in my dream that my brain was making up the plot and dialogue for. It was some kind of murder mystery and the protagonist was starting a conversation with a housemate in order to get some clues as to whether they could be the murderer. I got so excited by the fact that my mind was making up a story to read to itself in a dream that I was aware I was having that I woke myself up.
Lucid Dream #2: last night I had a dream that I was watching tv from my bed. Not my actual bed of course, but some other bed in a house we had recently moved into that was suspiciously similar to my actual bedroom but different. You know, dream world stuff. Anyway, I realized I was dreaming and decided to actually watch the movie carefully to see what my brain made up. The movie was getting crazier and crazier so when the protagonist was trying to run over the head of the evil biker gang sent to kill him with the motorcycle he stole by pushing one of the other gang members off of it (a sudden fog had descended to give him a fighting chance!) and the gang leader reacted by pulled out a gun and calmly shooting at him after declaring "I'd like to see you try" and then the protagonist turned into a werewolf as he was being shot on the stolen motorcycle as he was bearing straight onwards towards the gang leader... I woke myself up with the thought "this movie is ridiculous". Hmmm...
For the record, no movies this week about motorcycle gangs or werewolves and none of the books have been murder mysteries. I guess it's complicated up in the old KR noggin when the dream state descends...
Other people be like: Chris Nolan films be, like, whack, dude.
Me: Don't you have dreams just like his movies?
--------
* Recently showed the kids "Napoleon Dynamite" in case you couldn't tell.
Every 'picture' you've seen of our home galaxy, the Milky Way, in its entirety is an artistic rendition. It's as if you've never been able to look into a mirror.
Sure we recognize the faults or suspicious motivations in others pretty easily. Harder though when it comes to ourselves or those that we have already accepted as trustworthy or righteous. That's why it's so hard when our heroes fail us or are revealed to be all too human. That's why it's hard to admit we're wrong.
In astronomy, we know less about our own galaxy, the Milky Way, than we do other galaxies. This somewhat surprising result is simply because we can't see the entire Milky Way in detail because we live in the middle of it. Other galaxies we can scan with surgical precision from afar and get a relatively unoccluded view. In fact, a lot of our conclusions about our own galaxy are formulated by looking careful examination of similar galaxies and drawing some inferences.
Recently, I've been struggling with a student's name (NN). Not uncommon for me but for whatever reason I've been struggling especially hard with this one (getting older seems to make it harder to change a firmly lodged wrong idea it seems (something about 'old dogs' and 'new tricks' ?)). Anyway, I found myself covering for my embarrassment (or rather not admitting to myself that I was embarrassed) by making a light joke when NN calls me on the continuing mispronunciation ("Oh, I was mislead by your friends purposefully mispronouncing your name when I ask"). Just last week I realized that I was making excuses for myself and I quietly apologized to her for being so bad at something so basic. So easy for me to recognize when a student blames everyone and everything but their own study habits for their lack of academic success, but it takes me so long to realize I am doing the same thing.
Pictured below you will see my victory pose after describing how I was the only one in my high school physics class to get this 'bonus' problem correct (it's the classic 'slide a mass down a track through a loop-de-loop and determine the ratio of release height to radius of the loop' problem (2.5 is the answer for the record)). After my rather lame brag, most of the class was busy rolling their eyes over their masks and hoping I would just move on, but after I did a little faux-flex, SX asked me to 'do it again' which I obliged, resulting in this pic:
Sure, my students could have a better physics teacher, but it is highly unlikely that they would get one who would so proudly faux flex with such pretend gusto...
P.S. After looking at the board work in the pic, I realize that I told this entire story, flexing and all, BEFORE I even worked through the problem with them (the pictured problem is a different conservation of energy problem).
Teaching high school physics and trying to teach astronomy.
Married with two kids.
Ex-microplumber.
Ex-wine importer.
Beer Brewer. Lived in 7 states. Spent time in 19 different countries. Have bald spot - getting old.
Really three somewhat interesting books crammed into one:
-A history lesson on, the modern politics of, and an analysis of the Nobel prize (along with recommendations to make it better).
-An autobiography of the author
-A history of 20t...
Part a loose exposition of the inspiration that Jazz can take from physics and vice-verse and part an autobiography, this is an interesting read that doesn't have too much new material for anyone with a physics background. However, the p...